Shh – it’s a secret – Image #70

Having seen Simon Singh explaining how the Enigma machine worked while at a conference, I picked up this book. It charts the history of codes and ciphers from well before Roman times to the current day, and shows how they have developed over time. It was also very useful to read the difference between code (replacing words) and ciphers (replacing letters): most of what was discussed in the book fell into the latter category.


Singh writes in a very clear and informative manner, and makes the history of the topic interesting and at times exciting. I have to confess that some of the maths which was used went over my head, though I understood the general meaning in what was being said.

I was fascinated by the work done to understand the Linear A and Linear B languages, and the fact that initially scholars of Ancient Greek were convinced that neither text were part of that language: it must have been incredible for the person who finally worked out that Linear A was indeed Greek, albeit 500 years older than that used by Homer 3000 years ago.

The assertion that the most unbreakable code was that used by the Navajo code talkers in the Second World War is quite an interesting one. I understand that if you use a language that no-one else understands, then you improve the chances of it not being understood, but the fact that new phrases had to be introduced for English words which don’t appear in the native language must introduce some opportunities for the code breakers to make a start. Some form of frequency analysis would have some effect, but I think that the differences between Japanese kanji and English Roman script had something to do with it too.

The development of near-identical public key cryptography technologies by mathematicians in the US and the U.K. at approximately the same time is also an interesting revelation. (Diffie-Helman and RSA were both more or less simultaneously discovered on either side of the Atlantic, though GCHQ were slightly ahead in each case.) The fact that the cryptologists in the UK were based at GCHQ and therefore unable to share any of their work externally (or to review external solutions) shows I think that given enough time any technology can be “discovered” by different people in different locations.

In summary, I believe that this book is a good introduction to many different concepts, along with many good examples of each concept. It is well worth reading.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s